<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your comments, please &#160;(and a giveaway)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metamodern.com/2008/12/12/your-comments-please/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metamodern.com/2008/12/12/your-comments-please/</link>
	<description>The Trajectory of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 11:03:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Irvken Experience &#187; Mentifex has not gone away</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2008/12/12/your-comments-please/comment-page-2/#comment-1817</link>
		<dc:creator>The Irvken Experience &#187; Mentifex has not gone away</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 11:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=328#comment-1817</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;d been thinking of Arthur recently and then he showed up in the comments of Eric Drexlers new blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;d been thinking of Arthur recently and then he showed up in the comments of Eric Drexlers new blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Random Number and Neuroscience</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2008/12/12/your-comments-please/comment-page-2/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>A Random Number and Neuroscience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=328#comment-113</guid>
		<description>[...] My favorite random number generator evaluated the expression (+ 1 (random 47)) to the value “2”: Andy McKenzie, please send email me a suitable address (see the About page), and I&#8217;ll send you the book promised in the giveaway. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My favorite random number generator evaluated the expression (+ 1 (random 47)) to the value “2”: Andy McKenzie, please send email me a suitable address (see the About page), and I&#8217;ll send you the book promised in the giveaway. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex McLin</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2008/12/12/your-comments-please/comment-page-2/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex McLin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=328#comment-85</guid>
		<description>P.S. I know I&#039;ve already missed the deadline but I still wanted to add my comment to the thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. I know I&#8217;ve already missed the deadline but I still wanted to add my comment to the thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex McLin</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2008/12/12/your-comments-please/comment-page-2/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex McLin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=328#comment-84</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious how much of your original work in Nanosystems, you feel is now outdated or unrealistic? 

One common vision many people had was of swarms of self-replicating diamond robots transforming everything in sight. Subsequent work since have shown that vision to be unlikely, along with other fantastical ideas. Do you now see nanotechnology as something more mundane or it continue to hold awe for you?

What are you thoughts on the likelihood of a functional nanofactory becoming a reality in the next 10-15 years?

I&#039;m glad to see you blogging and posting ideas and reviews on the current state of the art in the field!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious how much of your original work in Nanosystems, you feel is now outdated or unrealistic? </p>
<p>One common vision many people had was of swarms of self-replicating diamond robots transforming everything in sight. Subsequent work since have shown that vision to be unlikely, along with other fantastical ideas. Do you now see nanotechnology as something more mundane or it continue to hold awe for you?</p>
<p>What are you thoughts on the likelihood of a functional nanofactory becoming a reality in the next 10-15 years?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad to see you blogging and posting ideas and reviews on the current state of the art in the field!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim McCabe</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2008/12/12/your-comments-please/comment-page-2/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim McCabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=328#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Professor Drexler,
It is both an honor and a pleasure to add to your blog. My university education in the sixties started inauspiciously as far as &quot;Science&quot; was concerned. In my first Physics lab we were told, by a massive, red cloaked Russian Jesuit, that since Architects had &quot;small or no brains at all&quot; (apologies to AAMilne), we would learn &quot;Physics for Architects&quot;. It was downhill from there for Science - who would think that building designers would need to understand materials?
Fortunately I had started reading Science Fiction at a tender age which ultimately led me to Michael Gross, Steven Hawking, Ray Kurzweil and &quot;Engines of Creation&quot;. My brain is slightly larger now and I understand the context, if not the nuts and bolts, of these amazing comments from amazing people.
Thank you so much for sharing with us. We Architects really need &quot;smart&quot; materials as soon as possible!

Best regards, 
Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Professor Drexler,<br />
It is both an honor and a pleasure to add to your blog. My university education in the sixties started inauspiciously as far as &#8220;Science&#8221; was concerned. In my first Physics lab we were told, by a massive, red cloaked Russian Jesuit, that since Architects had &#8220;small or no brains at all&#8221; (apologies to AAMilne), we would learn &#8220;Physics for Architects&#8221;. It was downhill from there for Science &#8211; who would think that building designers would need to understand materials?<br />
Fortunately I had started reading Science Fiction at a tender age which ultimately led me to Michael Gross, Steven Hawking, Ray Kurzweil and &#8220;Engines of Creation&#8221;. My brain is slightly larger now and I understand the context, if not the nuts and bolts, of these amazing comments from amazing people.<br />
Thank you so much for sharing with us. We Architects really need &#8220;smart&#8221; materials as soon as possible!</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2008/12/12/your-comments-please/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=328#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Speaking as a science-fiction type, I&#039;d absolutely love hearing about how you - and other authorities in various fields - have been influenced by science fiction, and possibly how often you find reason to slap your forehead when some layperson who takes science fiction too seriously and starts enquiring about &#039;Grey Goo&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking as a science-fiction type, I&#8217;d absolutely love hearing about how you &#8211; and other authorities in various fields &#8211; have been influenced by science fiction, and possibly how often you find reason to slap your forehead when some layperson who takes science fiction too seriously and starts enquiring about &#8216;Grey Goo&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark O'Leary</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2008/12/12/your-comments-please/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark O'Leary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 02:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=328#comment-78</guid>
		<description>First, I commend you for creating this blog!
Getting in late on this thread, I would only add that I would like to know a bit about your experience as a pioneer of a radical new concept.
From the outside it appears you have travelled a personally tough road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, I commend you for creating this blog!<br />
Getting in late on this thread, I would only add that I would like to know a bit about your experience as a pioneer of a radical new concept.<br />
From the outside it appears you have travelled a personally tough road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comments on Comments</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2008/12/12/your-comments-please/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Comments on Comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=328#comment-77</guid>
		<description>[...] be responding at greater length to comments I invited a few days ago, but right now, I’d like to thank everyone who offered thoughts, news, questions, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be responding at greater length to comments I invited a few days ago, but right now, I’d like to thank everyone who offered thoughts, news, questions, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

