The Nobel Prize for Technology

by Eric Drexler on 2009/01/08

Alfred Nobel set good criteria in his will
Alfred Nobel chose well

We usually think of Nobel Prizes in physics, chemistry, and medicine as celebrations of scientific discovery, yet prizes are often awarded not for discovery, but for technological innovation. This is entirely proper, as you can perhaps see from the above excerpt of Alfred Nobel’s will.

I surveyed the awards since 2000 to see which were granted for the invention of new instruments and methods. Here‘s what I found, and the message for science administrators and ambitious young scientists. First, the list:

Nobel Prize awards
for technological innovation, 2000–2008

Year Laureate Nature of achievement How the achievement was described
2000 Zhores I. Alferov techniques for producing semiconductor devices developing semiconductor heterostructures used in high-speed- and opto-electronics
2008 Martin Chalfie molecular tool for biological studies discovery and development of the green fluorescent protein, GFP
2005 Yves Chauvin techniques for producing molecules development of the metathesis method in organic synthesis
2001 Eric A. Cornell techniques for producing a new state of matter achievement of Bose-Einstein condensation in dilute gases of alkali atoms, and for early fundamental studies of the properties of the condensates
2002 John B. Fenn techniques for biomolecular analysis development of soft desorption ionisation methods for mass spectrometric analyses of biological macromolecules
2005 Robert H. Grubbs techniques for producing molecules development of the metathesis method in organic synthesis
2005 John L. Hall optical instrumentation and techniques contributions to the development of laser-based precision spectroscopy, including the optical frequency comb technique
2005 Theodor W. Hänsch optical instrumentation and techniques contributions to the development of laser-based precision spectroscopy, including the optical frequency comb technique
2000 Alan J. Heeger techniques for producing materials discovery and development of conductive polymers
2001 Wolfgang Ketterle techniques for producing a new state of matter achievement of Bose-Einstein condensation in dilute gases of alkali atoms, and for early fundamental studies of the properties of the condensates
2000 Jack S. Kilby techniques for producing semiconductor devices his part in the invention of the integrated circuit
2001 William S. Knowles techniques for producing molecules work on chirally catalysed hydrogenation reactions
2000 Herbert Kroemer techniques for producing semiconductor devices developing semiconductor heterostructures used in high-speed- and opto-electronics
2008 Paul Lauterbur instrumentation for biomedical studies discoveries concerning magnetic resonance imaging
2000 Alan G. MacDiarmid techniques for producing materials discovery and development of conductive polymers
2008 Peter Mansfield instrumentation for biomedical studies discoveries concerning magnetic resonance imaging
2001 Ryoji Noyorii techniques for producing molecules work on chirally catalysed hydrogenation reactions
2005 Richard R. Schrock techniques for producing molecules development of the metathesis method in organic synthesis
2001 K. Barry Sharpless techniques for producing molecules work on chirally catalysed oxidation reactions
2008 Osamu Shimomura molecular tool for biological studies discovery and development of the green fluorescent protein, GFP
2000 Hideki Shirakawa techniques for producing materials discovery and development of conductive polymers
2002 Koichi Tanaka techniques for biomolecular analysis development of soft desorption ionisation methods for mass spectrometric analyses of biological macromolecules
2008 Roger Y. Tsien molecular tool for biological studies discovery and development of the green fluorescent protein, GFP
2001 Carl E. Wieman techniques for producing a new state of matter achievement of Bose-Einstein condensation in dilute gases of alkali atoms, and for early fundamental studies of the properties of the condensates
2002 Kurt Wüthrich instruments and techniques for biomolecular characterization development of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy for determining the three-dimensional structure of biological macromolecules in solution

I’d like to see more Nobel Prizes granted for technological innovations.

As as I’ve noted, technological innovations in science — new instruments, new methods — drive the advance of science at least as much as does scientific discovery. It is often these technological innovations that make discovery even possible: consider the advances in scientific knowledge that have been enabled by advances in the technologies of microscopes, telescopes, chemical synthesis, and gene sequencing.

Scientific discoveries help experimentalists chiefly by helping them decide what to investigate next. Yet in more and more areas, advances in instrumentation enable a mode of science that, in effect, looks at everything, on the very basic theory that enormous masses of data will aid discovery.

A focus on methods and instruments is consistent with the will that established the prize. In the excerpt above, Alfred Nobel states his intention that his prize reward “discovery or invention” in physics, and “discovery or improvement” in chemistry — and further, that these be the advances that have “conferred the greatest benefit on mankind”.

Advances in technologies that serve science often receive the reward of extensive citation. They are worthy of greater funding and more widespread personal ambition. Nobel would approve: science-enabling technologies often serve both science and practical human ends — this is true even of improvements in instruments intended to capture the faintest signals from furthest realms cosmology.


Update, 2009: Charles K. Kao, Willard S. Boyle and George E. Smith received this year’s Nobel Prize in Physics: Kao “for groundbreaking achievements concerning the transmission of light in fibers for optical communication”; Boyle and Smith for “for the invention of an imaging semiconductor circuit – the CCD sensor”. Both are technologies of great importance.


{ 3 comments }

John Thompson January 8, 2009 at 2:14 am UTC

Thoroughly agree. Word. The stuff that makes stuff really is the stuff.

Phillip Huggan January 8, 2009 at 6:59 pm UTC

A chemical means of synthesizing a carbon dimer diamond building X-bar AFM tool-tip should be Chemistry Nobel Prize worthy. Novel nanosensors will streamline the industrial base, maybe an Economics Nobel Prize win for whoever can figure out how to commodify nanomaterials.

Andrew Maynard January 9, 2009 at 2:01 pm UTC

Thanks for the post – another confirmation that the old linear model of basic research – applied research – technology innovation is long-outmoded.

Just wish that more people influencing the R&D agenda realized this…

Previous post:

Next post: