<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From Self-Assembly to Mechanosynthesis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metamodern.com/2009/02/03/from-self-assembly-to-mechanosynthesis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/02/03/from-self-assembly-to-mechanosynthesis/</link>
	<description>The Trajectory of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:09:47 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Self assembly and nanomachines: Complexity, motion, and computational control &#124; NanoLinxs</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/02/03/from-self-assembly-to-mechanosynthesis/comment-page-1/#comment-3022</link>
		<dc:creator>Self assembly and nanomachines: Complexity, motion, and computational control &#124; NanoLinxs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=1364#comment-3022</guid>
		<description>[...] Brownian motion, constrained Brownian motion, and more macro-machine-like devices (discussed in “From Self-Assembly to Mechanosynthesis”, and Motors, Brownian Motors, and Brownian Mechanosynthesis). You are right that the relative sizes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Brownian motion, constrained Brownian motion, and more macro-machine-like devices (discussed in “From Self-Assembly to Mechanosynthesis”, and Motors, Brownian Motors, and Brownian Mechanosynthesis). You are right that the relative sizes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Drexler Talks about Self Assembly at Metamodern and Chris Phoenix does the same at CRNano &#124; NanoLinxs</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/02/03/from-self-assembly-to-mechanosynthesis/comment-page-1/#comment-2933</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Drexler Talks about Self Assembly at Metamodern and Chris Phoenix does the same at CRNano &#124; NanoLinxs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 03:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=1364#comment-2933</guid>
		<description>[...] Brownian motion, constrained Brownian motion, and more macro-machine-like devices (discussed in “From Self-Assembly to Mechanosynthesis”, and Motors, Brownian Motors, and Brownian Mechanosynthesis). You are right that the relative sizes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Brownian motion, constrained Brownian motion, and more macro-machine-like devices (discussed in “From Self-Assembly to Mechanosynthesis”, and Motors, Brownian Motors, and Brownian Mechanosynthesis). You are right that the relative sizes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Molecular Machine Path to Molecular Manufacturing: (2) Exploiting Better Methods and Building Blocks</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/02/03/from-self-assembly-to-mechanosynthesis/comment-page-1/#comment-2411</link>
		<dc:creator>The Molecular Machine Path to Molecular Manufacturing: (2) Exploiting Better Methods and Building Blocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=1364#comment-2411</guid>
		<description>[...] and performance — moving from 1D to 2D positional control of reaction locations, moving along the spectrum between self-assembly and mechanosynthesis, and expanding the range of molecular building blocks and products that can be made. Eventually, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and performance — moving from 1D to 2D positional control of reaction locations, moving along the spectrum between self-assembly and mechanosynthesis, and expanding the range of molecular building blocks and products that can be made. Eventually, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Molecular Machine Path to Molecular Manufacturing: (2) Exploiting Better Methods and Building Blocks</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/02/03/from-self-assembly-to-mechanosynthesis/comment-page-1/#comment-2394</link>
		<dc:creator>The Molecular Machine Path to Molecular Manufacturing: (2) Exploiting Better Methods and Building Blocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=1364#comment-2394</guid>
		<description>[...] with complexity — moving from 1D to 2D positional control of reaction locations, moving along the spectrum between self-assembly and mechanosynthesis, and expanding the range of molecular building blocks and products that can be made. Eventually, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with complexity — moving from 1D to 2D positional control of reaction locations, moving along the spectrum between self-assembly and mechanosynthesis, and expanding the range of molecular building blocks and products that can be made. Eventually, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Molecular Machine Path to Molecular Manufacturing (1)</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/02/03/from-self-assembly-to-mechanosynthesis/comment-page-1/#comment-2369</link>
		<dc:creator>The Molecular Machine Path to Molecular Manufacturing (1)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 09:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=1364#comment-2369</guid>
		<description>[...] The expanded scope of component fabrication can be applied to improve Brownian assembly, but constrained Brownian assembly will become more practical and desirable as fabrication technologies [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The expanded scope of component fabrication can be applied to improve Brownian assembly, but constrained Brownian assembly will become more practical and desirable as fabrication technologies [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quantum Computing: Sorry, no speedup in solving linear systems</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/02/03/from-self-assembly-to-mechanosynthesis/comment-page-1/#comment-2039</link>
		<dc:creator>Quantum Computing: Sorry, no speedup in solving linear systems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=1364#comment-2039</guid>
		<description>[...] vivid example is the simplistic equation of atomically precise fabrication (for example, by using positional constraints to localize familiar kinds of chemical reactions) with grabbing and placing individual atoms (which [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] vivid example is the simplistic equation of atomically precise fabrication (for example, by using positional constraints to localize familiar kinds of chemical reactions) with grabbing and placing individual atoms (which [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What can scaling laws tell us about nanomachines?</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/02/03/from-self-assembly-to-mechanosynthesis/comment-page-1/#comment-1934</link>
		<dc:creator>What can scaling laws tell us about nanomachines?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=1364#comment-1934</guid>
		<description>[...] A caveat: These scaling laws for mechanical systems apply in the presence of internal friction (an L2 force), but not in the presence of viscous drag from a surrounding medium, which scales as L1, and with less accuracy. The scaling laws that involve both speed and force are therefore of interest primarily in systems that are far from the biomimetic end of the spectrum of technologies that I’ve discussed in many other posts (for example, here and here). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A caveat: These scaling laws for mechanical systems apply in the presence of internal friction (an L2 force), but not in the presence of viscous drag from a surrounding medium, which scales as L1, and with less accuracy. The scaling laws that involve both speed and force are therefore of interest primarily in systems that are far from the biomimetic end of the spectrum of technologies that I’ve discussed in many other posts (for example, here and here). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: For Darwin Day: On the Origin of Genetic Information</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/02/03/from-self-assembly-to-mechanosynthesis/comment-page-1/#comment-1303</link>
		<dc:creator>For Darwin Day: On the Origin of Genetic Information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=1364#comment-1303</guid>
		<description>[...] On information in fabrication: From Self-Assembly to Mechanosynthesis [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On information in fabrication: From Self-Assembly to Mechanosynthesis [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
