<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making vs. Modeling: A paradox of progress in nanotechnology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metamodern.com/2009/02/25/making-vs-modeling-in-nanotechnology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/02/25/making-vs-modeling-in-nanotechnology/</link>
	<description>The Trajectory of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 11:03:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Physical Basis of High-Throughput Atomically Precise Manufacturing</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/02/25/making-vs-modeling-in-nanotechnology/comment-page-1/#comment-4662</link>
		<dc:creator>The Physical Basis of High-Throughput Atomically Precise Manufacturing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=2011#comment-4662</guid>
		<description>[...] that are compositions of components that consist of strong, stiff covalent solids, are by design easier to model than biological systems for two reasons: First, stiffer, more robust structures are insensitive to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that are compositions of components that consist of strong, stiff covalent solids, are by design easier to model than biological systems for two reasons: First, stiffer, more robust structures are insensitive to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molecular Manufacturing: The NRC study and its recommendations</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/02/25/making-vs-modeling-in-nanotechnology/comment-page-1/#comment-2549</link>
		<dc:creator>Molecular Manufacturing: The NRC study and its recommendations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 07:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=2011#comment-2549</guid>
		<description>[...] I discussed in “Making vs. Modeling: A paradox of progress in nanotechnology”, each generation of tools can be expected to enable fabrication processes and products that are more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I discussed in “Making vs. Modeling: A paradox of progress in nanotechnology”, each generation of tools can be expected to enable fabrication processes and products that are more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is simple? Polyethylene, molecular modeling, and molecular machines</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/02/25/making-vs-modeling-in-nanotechnology/comment-page-1/#comment-1281</link>
		<dc:creator>What is simple? Polyethylene, molecular modeling, and molecular machines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=2011#comment-1281</guid>
		<description>[...] to achieve a limited — yet powerful —set of insights into future technologies, and in an earlier post I described why the intricate molecular systems that can be made today are challenging to model, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to achieve a limited — yet powerful —set of insights into future technologies, and in an earlier post I described why the intricate molecular systems that can be made today are challenging to model, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earth Day 1970, and a high road down to molecules</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/02/25/making-vs-modeling-in-nanotechnology/comment-page-1/#comment-1135</link>
		<dc:creator>Earth Day 1970, and a high road down to molecules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 04:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=2011#comment-1135</guid>
		<description>[...] base has advanced, paths forward have come into clearer focus, and physics-based analysis has (perhaps surprisingly) deepened understanding of a small but significant portion of what will be enabled by fabrication [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] base has advanced, paths forward have come into clearer focus, and physics-based analysis has (perhaps surprisingly) deepened understanding of a small but significant portion of what will be enabled by fabrication [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Making vs. Modeling: A paradox of progress in nanotechnology &#124; Nano Broadcast</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/02/25/making-vs-modeling-in-nanotechnology/comment-page-1/#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator>Making vs. Modeling: A paradox of progress in nanotechnology &#124; Nano Broadcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=2011#comment-580</guid>
		<description>[...] View post: Making vs. Modeling: A paradox of progress in nanotechnology [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] View post: Making vs. Modeling: A paradox of progress in nanotechnology [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

