<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Small Parts  (with videos)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metamodern.com/2009/02/27/high-throughput-nanomanufacturing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/02/27/high-throughput-nanomanufacturing/</link>
	<description>The Trajectory of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:33:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Self assembly and nanomachines: Complexity, motion, and computational control &#124; NanoLinxs</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/02/27/high-throughput-nanomanufacturing/comment-page-1/#comment-3023</link>
		<dc:creator>Self assembly and nanomachines: Complexity, motion, and computational control &#124; NanoLinxs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=2083#comment-3023</guid>
		<description>[...] manufacturing works today. I’ve discussed this in posts with videos of machines in action: “High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Small Parts” and “High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Assembly,” with a more quantitative discussion of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] manufacturing works today. I’ve discussed this in posts with videos of machines in action: “High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Small Parts” and “High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Assembly,” with a more quantitative discussion of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Drexler Talks about Self Assembly at Metamodern and Chris Phoenix does the same at CRNano &#124; NanoLinxs</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/02/27/high-throughput-nanomanufacturing/comment-page-1/#comment-2934</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Drexler Talks about Self Assembly at Metamodern and Chris Phoenix does the same at CRNano &#124; NanoLinxs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 03:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=2083#comment-2934</guid>
		<description>[...] manufacturing works today. I’ve discussed this in posts with videos of machines in action: “High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Small Parts” and “High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Assembly,” with a more quantitative discussion of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] manufacturing works today. I’ve discussed this in posts with videos of machines in action: “High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Small Parts” and “High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Assembly,” with a more quantitative discussion of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why I hate “nanobots”</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/02/27/high-throughput-nanomanufacturing/comment-page-1/#comment-2906</link>
		<dc:creator>Why I hate “nanobots”</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=2083#comment-2906</guid>
		<description>[...] High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Small Parts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Small Parts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Productive Nanosystems: The Ribosome Videos</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/02/27/high-throughput-nanomanufacturing/comment-page-1/#comment-1960</link>
		<dc:creator>Productive Nanosystems: The Ribosome Videos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=2083#comment-1960</guid>
		<description>[...] High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Small Parts (with videos) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Small Parts (with videos) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agile robots, dexterous robots (with videos)</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/02/27/high-throughput-nanomanufacturing/comment-page-1/#comment-1734</link>
		<dc:creator>Agile robots, dexterous robots (with videos)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 07:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=2083#comment-1734</guid>
		<description>[...] — Small Parts (with videos, no robots) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] — Small Parts (with videos, no robots) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/02/27/high-throughput-nanomanufacturing/comment-page-1/#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=2083#comment-725</guid>
		<description>Hello Eric. After reading for some time about our endless technological progress. It occurred to me that we are in a transition. Not just for mankind but the basic meaning of life it self. From the expanse of space came large chunks of rock like the one we live on, then primordial slime, plants, animals and so far this progress has led to us. Plants and animals can adapt to the environment, but we have the smarts do do that pretty well. After using a bone as a mallet, then stone tools to steel we have carved our way down to precisely moving individual atoms. The same can be said for the progress we have made in just about every other task we have set our minds to.  So we are pretty tricky. Our little tools and tricks have also brought together the minds of everyone on the planet to make some sort of super knowledge. Like a giant brain that is experiencing rapid evolution. So stepping on from our biological selves is our man made synthetic evolution. A transition from blind natural selection being top dog to intelligence being number one, An entirely new force of nature. This has to cause some friction with the old regime. Which I think we can see in the death throws of life´s little incubator, our planets environment. With everything happening around us I think people have the right to be suspicious. Even little mundane transitions like breaking up with your girlfriend can be pretty rough. But creating an entirely new paradigm for dominance in the universe has to be a fairly daunting task. (Dude thats awesome are we actually doing that?) This is a truly fantastic ride. But I think we have no idea what so ever whats going to come out of this. So even silly questions a worth a thorougher look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Eric. After reading for some time about our endless technological progress. It occurred to me that we are in a transition. Not just for mankind but the basic meaning of life it self. From the expanse of space came large chunks of rock like the one we live on, then primordial slime, plants, animals and so far this progress has led to us. Plants and animals can adapt to the environment, but we have the smarts do do that pretty well. After using a bone as a mallet, then stone tools to steel we have carved our way down to precisely moving individual atoms. The same can be said for the progress we have made in just about every other task we have set our minds to.  So we are pretty tricky. Our little tools and tricks have also brought together the minds of everyone on the planet to make some sort of super knowledge. Like a giant brain that is experiencing rapid evolution. So stepping on from our biological selves is our man made synthetic evolution. A transition from blind natural selection being top dog to intelligence being number one, An entirely new force of nature. This has to cause some friction with the old regime. Which I think we can see in the death throws of life´s little incubator, our planets environment. With everything happening around us I think people have the right to be suspicious. Even little mundane transitions like breaking up with your girlfriend can be pretty rough. But creating an entirely new paradigm for dominance in the universe has to be a fairly daunting task. (Dude thats awesome are we actually doing that?) This is a truly fantastic ride. But I think we have no idea what so ever whats going to come out of this. So even silly questions a worth a thorougher look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nanotechnology &#187; Nanoscale manufacturing how-to</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/02/27/high-throughput-nanomanufacturing/comment-page-1/#comment-677</link>
		<dc:creator>Nanotechnology &#187; Nanoscale manufacturing how-to</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 12:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=2083#comment-677</guid>
		<description>[...] has been describing how he thinks nanoscale manufacturing should be developed. For example, in a recent post, he makes a case for not using robotic machines to put molecules together, but instead, using [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has been describing how he thinks nanoscale manufacturing should be developed. For example, in a recent post, he makes a case for not using robotic machines to put molecules together, but instead, using [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Assembling larger products (with videos)</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/02/27/high-throughput-nanomanufacturing/comment-page-1/#comment-643</link>
		<dc:creator>High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Assembling larger products (with videos)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=2083#comment-643</guid>
		<description>[...] High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Small Parts (with videos)  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Small Parts (with videos)  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
