<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Assembly (with videos)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metamodern.com/2009/03/01/high-throughput-nanomanufacturing-assembly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/03/01/high-throughput-nanomanufacturing-assembly/</link>
	<description>The Trajectory of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:15:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Banks</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/03/01/high-throughput-nanomanufacturing-assembly/comment-page-1/#comment-4145</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Banks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 00:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=2115#comment-4145</guid>
		<description>Hello Eric I read Engines back in 96 when none I spoke to knew anything about nanotechnology (right up to around 2004) but it certainly fired me up.

So are you saying now that the original idea of having the nano equivalent of a seed or something larger than a desktop nanofactory to create large scale artifacts like cars, jets, spacecraft etc isnt feasible?

Will things that big have to be assembled in normal style factories from nanofactured building blocks?

What about buildings?

If nature can build a giant tree from a seed why couldnt we eventually do something similar? Just in terms of using nanofacturing to take the artifact all the way from beginning to completion no matter how large it is.

Also is the concept still looking feasible that nanofactured artifacts can be artificially intelligent and alive in the sense of models developed in the field of artificial life?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Eric I read Engines back in 96 when none I spoke to knew anything about nanotechnology (right up to around 2004) but it certainly fired me up.</p>
<p>So are you saying now that the original idea of having the nano equivalent of a seed or something larger than a desktop nanofactory to create large scale artifacts like cars, jets, spacecraft etc isnt feasible?</p>
<p>Will things that big have to be assembled in normal style factories from nanofactured building blocks?</p>
<p>What about buildings?</p>
<p>If nature can build a giant tree from a seed why couldnt we eventually do something similar? Just in terms of using nanofacturing to take the artifact all the way from beginning to completion no matter how large it is.</p>
<p>Also is the concept still looking feasible that nanofactured artifacts can be artificially intelligent and alive in the sense of models developed in the field of artificial life?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A filler robot post</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/03/01/high-throughput-nanomanufacturing-assembly/comment-page-1/#comment-3425</link>
		<dc:creator>A filler robot post</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 03:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=2115#comment-3425</guid>
		<description>[...] — Assembly (with videos, no robots) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] — Assembly (with videos, no robots) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Self assembly and nanomachines: Complexity, motion, and computational control &#124; NanoLinxs</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/03/01/high-throughput-nanomanufacturing-assembly/comment-page-1/#comment-3045</link>
		<dc:creator>Self assembly and nanomachines: Complexity, motion, and computational control &#124; NanoLinxs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 02:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=2115#comment-3045</guid>
		<description>[...] posts with videos of machines in action: “High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Small Parts” and “High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Assembly,” with a more quantitative discussion of “molecular mills” on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posts with videos of machines in action: “High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Small Parts” and “High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Assembly,” with a more quantitative discussion of “molecular mills” on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Most popular posts, continued&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/03/01/high-throughput-nanomanufacturing-assembly/comment-page-1/#comment-2106</link>
		<dc:creator>Most popular posts, continued&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=2115#comment-2106</guid>
		<description>[...] High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Assembly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Assembly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Productive Nanosystems: The Ribosome Videos</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/03/01/high-throughput-nanomanufacturing-assembly/comment-page-1/#comment-1961</link>
		<dc:creator>Productive Nanosystems: The Ribosome Videos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=2115#comment-1961</guid>
		<description>[...] High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Assembly (with videos)    &#160;&#160;  Subscribe [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Assembly (with videos)    &nbsp;&nbsp;  Subscribe [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agile robots, dexterous robots (with videos)</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/03/01/high-throughput-nanomanufacturing-assembly/comment-page-1/#comment-1741</link>
		<dc:creator>Agile robots, dexterous robots (with videos)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=2115#comment-1741</guid>
		<description>[...] — Assembly (with videos, no robots) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] — Assembly (with videos, no robots) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Small Parts (with videos)</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/03/01/high-throughput-nanomanufacturing-assembly/comment-page-1/#comment-1181</link>
		<dc:creator>High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Small Parts (with videos)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=2115#comment-1181</guid>
		<description>[...] also: High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Assembly (with videos) Assembling larger products (with videos) The Physical Basis of Atomically Precise Manufacturing    [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also: High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing: Assembly (with videos) Assembling larger products (with videos) The Physical Basis of Atomically Precise Manufacturing    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Drexler</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/03/01/high-throughput-nanomanufacturing-assembly/comment-page-1/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Drexler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=2115#comment-692</guid>
		<description>@ Will -- Yes, that’s a good way to think of the tradeoffs and how to balance them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Will &#8212; Yes, that’s a good way to think of the tradeoffs and how to balance them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

