<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Atomic Layer Deposition for Atomically Precise Fabrication (1)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metamodern.com/2009/03/23/atomic-layer-deposition-for-atomically-precise-fabrication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/03/23/atomic-layer-deposition-for-atomically-precise-fabrication/</link>
	<description>The Trajectory of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 11:03:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pages tagged "precise"</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/03/23/atomic-layer-deposition-for-atomically-precise-fabrication/comment-page-1/#comment-953</link>
		<dc:creator>Pages tagged "precise"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=2604#comment-953</guid>
		<description>[...] bookmarks tagged precise Atomic Layer Deposition for Atomically Precise Fab...&#160;saved by 2 others  &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;JimLovesFirefly bookmarked on 04/16/09 &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bookmarks tagged precise Atomic Layer Deposition for Atomically Precise Fab&#8230;&nbsp;saved by 2 others  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;JimLovesFirefly bookmarked on 04/16/09 | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Drexler</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/03/23/atomic-layer-deposition-for-atomically-precise-fabrication/comment-page-1/#comment-783</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Drexler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=2604#comment-783</guid>
		<description>@ Andrew — That’s a nice piece of work, and a substantial advance in the state of the art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Andrew — That’s a nice piece of work, and a substantial advance in the state of the art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Drexler</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/03/23/atomic-layer-deposition-for-atomically-precise-fabrication/comment-page-1/#comment-782</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Drexler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=2604#comment-782</guid>
		<description>@ Scott Jensen — I haven’t heard of a timeline, and research of this sort has enough constraints and scientific unknowns to make predictions unwise, not only regarding timelines, but regarding feasibility.

Although timelines are always hard to predict, an attractive feature of self-assembly approaches is that they involve less discovery and more design. Zyvex is gambling — and it may prove to be a very good gamble — on the discovery of new chemical processes involving small molecules. Processes of this sort may be similar to one another, but each is substantially unique. Although experimentation and discovery can be guided by well-informed guesses there is no systematic way to design one.

In macromolecular engineering, by contrast, structures are made by combining many pieces in a systematic way, and this process creates a vast, combinatorial design space. This makes design possible, though supplemented with a lot of trial-and-error in the early days. If the operating principles and general structure of an intended product are sufficiently similar to those of known systems, there can be good reason to be confident that the design space contains many structures that would satisfy the product’s functional specifications. Confidence in feasibility still doesn’t provide a timeline, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Scott Jensen — I haven’t heard of a timeline, and research of this sort has enough constraints and scientific unknowns to make predictions unwise, not only regarding timelines, but regarding feasibility.</p>
<p>Although timelines are always hard to predict, an attractive feature of self-assembly approaches is that they involve less discovery and more design. Zyvex is gambling — and it may prove to be a very good gamble — on the discovery of new chemical processes involving small molecules. Processes of this sort may be similar to one another, but each is substantially unique. Although experimentation and discovery can be guided by well-informed guesses there is no systematic way to design one.</p>
<p>In macromolecular engineering, by contrast, structures are made by combining many pieces in a systematic way, and this process creates a vast, combinatorial design space. This makes design possible, though supplemented with a lot of trial-and-error in the early days. If the operating principles and general structure of an intended product are sufficiently similar to those of known systems, there can be good reason to be confident that the design space contains many structures that would satisfy the product’s functional specifications. Confidence in feasibility still doesn’t provide a timeline, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/03/23/atomic-layer-deposition-for-atomically-precise-fabrication/comment-page-1/#comment-776</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=2604#comment-776</guid>
		<description>Sorry, the link should be: http://esciencenews.com/articles/2009/03/25/making.a.point.picoscale.stability.a.room.temperature.afm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, the link should be: <a href="http://esciencenews.com/articles/2009/03/25/making.a.point.picoscale.stability.a.room.temperature.afm" rel="nofollow">http://esciencenews.com/articles/2009/03/25/making.a.point.picoscale.stability.a.room.temperature.afm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/03/23/atomic-layer-deposition-for-atomically-precise-fabrication/comment-page-1/#comment-775</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=2604#comment-775</guid>
		<description>Just came across this: a way to controll the AFM probe’s position in three dimensions to better than 40 picometers over 100 seconds:

controlled the probe’s position in three dimensions to better than 40 picometers (1 nanometer = 1000 picometers) over 100 seconds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just came across this: a way to controll the AFM probe’s position in three dimensions to better than 40 picometers over 100 seconds:</p>
<p>controlled the probe’s position in three dimensions to better than 40 picometers (1 nanometer = 1000 picometers) over 100 seconds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Jensen</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/03/23/atomic-layer-deposition-for-atomically-precise-fabrication/comment-page-1/#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=2604#comment-769</guid>
		<description>Has Zyvex given a timeline when they think they&#039;ll achieve their objective?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has Zyvex given a timeline when they think they&#8217;ll achieve their objective?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

