From the monthly archives:

March 2009

Why I hate “nanobots”

March 7, 2009

For background:

I disliked the word “nanobot” the first time I heard it.
I like it less now.
I don’t know what it means.

Once, “robot” meant a machine that resembled a human being. In fiction, robots usually were intelligent and capable of plot-advancing independent action.
Later, “robot” also meant a machine with an arm that could do certain kinds [...]

Read the full article →

To improve US fuel economy,
stop talking about MPG!

March 5, 2009

I want a car that uses less gasoline — fewer gallons per mile — but car makers quote fuel economy in miles per gallon instead. The resulting numbers are counter-intuitive, leading to decisions that create needless waste, cost, and CO2 emissions.
For example, upgrading from a 20 mpg car to a 35 mpg car seems about [...]

Read the full article →

High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing:
Assembling larger products (with videos)

March 4, 2009

I’ll get back to self-assembly and related topics soon, but at the moment, I’d like to show more about how macroscale manufacturing works today. There are strong analogies to engineering problems that will arise when a technology base is in place for building complex nanomachines, and I hope that even readers from manufacturing-oriented engineering cultures [...]

Read the full article →

The Space Debris Collision Problem

March 3, 2009

A few weeks ago, a US and Russian satellite collided, spreading debris around near-Earth space. The video below shows an animation based on a state-of-the-art model of the event and the resulting clouds of ultra-high-speed projectiles. Collisions like this can be expected to occur with increasing frequency.
The Economist just ran an editorial calling for countries [...]

Read the full article →

High-Throughput Nanomanufacturing:
Assembly (with videos)

March 1, 2009

If you wanted to use automation to assemble an enormous number of small things, would you use robots? For throughput in the 100 ms/cycle, million-product-per-day range, a room full of robots waving their arms around might not be the best solution. A manufacturing engineer is more likely to think of using a machine like the [...]

Read the full article →