Comments on: A Map of Science http://metamodern.com/2009/05/20/a-map-of-science/ The Trajectory of Technology Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:33:58 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Chemists deserve more credit: Atoms, Einstein, and the Matthew Effect http://metamodern.com/2009/05/20/a-map-of-science/comment-page-1/#comment-2964 Chemists deserve more credit: Atoms, Einstein, and the Matthew Effect Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:42:54 +0000 http://metamodern.com/?p=3720#comment-2964 [...] A Map of Science [...] [...] A Map of Science [...]

]]> By: How many minds produce knowledge (and how they don’t) http://metamodern.com/2009/05/20/a-map-of-science/comment-page-1/#comment-2265 How many minds produce knowledge (and how they don’t) Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:39:35 +0000 http://metamodern.com/?p=3720#comment-2265 [...] A Map of Science [...] [...] A Map of Science [...]

]]> By: Knowledge about Knowledge: The most popular posts in the first year http://metamodern.com/2009/05/20/a-map-of-science/comment-page-1/#comment-2199 Knowledge about Knowledge: The most popular posts in the first year Sat, 28 Nov 2009 03:12:28 +0000 http://metamodern.com/?p=3720#comment-2199 [...] A Map of Science [...] [...] A Map of Science [...]

]]> By: Exploratory Engineering: Applying the predictive power of science to future technologies http://metamodern.com/2009/05/20/a-map-of-science/comment-page-1/#comment-2153 Exploratory Engineering: Applying the predictive power of science to future technologies Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:00:04 +0000 http://metamodern.com/?p=3720#comment-2153 [...] A Map of Science [...] [...] A Map of Science [...]

]]> By: Comments on Science, Engineering, and Innovation for The Drucker Institute http://metamodern.com/2009/05/20/a-map-of-science/comment-page-1/#comment-1645 Comments on Science, Engineering, and Innovation for The Drucker Institute Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:08:41 +0000 http://metamodern.com/?p=3720#comment-1645 [...] A Map of Science    Subscribe [...] [...] A Map of Science    Subscribe [...]

]]> By: Eric Drexler http://metamodern.com/2009/05/20/a-map-of-science/comment-page-1/#comment-1446 Eric Drexler Sat, 08 Aug 2009 22:13:45 +0000 http://metamodern.com/?p=3720#comment-1446 @ modeless -- Thanks, that’s very nice. I’ve noted it in the post and redirected the link from the image. @ modeless — Thanks, that’s very nice. I’ve noted it in the post and redirected the link from the image.

]]> By: Eric Drexler http://metamodern.com/2009/05/20/a-map-of-science/comment-page-1/#comment-1444 Eric Drexler Sat, 08 Aug 2009 21:48:33 +0000 http://metamodern.com/?p=3720#comment-1444 @ Dr. J -- It’s there, but not marked by one of the large labels in the thumbnail version of the image above. The less-visible labels “Earth Sciences” and “Ecology” mark the brown peninsula pointing inward near the large label “Biology”. The aggregate size of these is rather small, but the clustering algorithm may have put parts of geophysics with physics, parts of atmospheric chemistry with chemistry, and so on. @ Dr. J — It’s there, but not marked by one of the large labels in the thumbnail version of the image above. The less-visible labels “Earth Sciences” and “Ecology” mark the brown peninsula pointing inward near the large label “Biology”.

The aggregate size of these is rather small, but the clustering algorithm may have put parts of geophysics with physics, parts of atmospheric chemistry with chemistry, and so on.

]]> By: Dr. J http://metamodern.com/2009/05/20/a-map-of-science/comment-page-1/#comment-1440 Dr. J Sat, 08 Aug 2009 14:59:35 +0000 http://metamodern.com/?p=3720#comment-1440 So why is the entire field of Geology (earth sciences if you like) totally missing? So why is the entire field of Geology (earth sciences if you like) totally missing?

]]>