Comments on: Nanotechnology research papers: The world’s most prolific authors http://metamodern.com/2009/10/30/nanotechnology-research-papers-the-world%e2%80%99s-most-prolific-authors/ The Trajectory of Technology Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:33:58 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: YIKES! http://metamodern.com/2009/10/30/nanotechnology-research-papers-the-world%e2%80%99s-most-prolific-authors/comment-page-1/#comment-2099 YIKES! Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:17:47 +0000 http://metamodern.com/?p=5396#comment-2099 Who is ahead in safety and containment of nanotechnology? The same people managing plastics and e-waste? Who is ahead in safety and containment of nanotechnology? The same people managing plastics and e-waste?

]]> By: nanotürkiye http://metamodern.com/2009/10/30/nanotechnology-research-papers-the-world%e2%80%99s-most-prolific-authors/comment-page-1/#comment-2064 nanotürkiye Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:07:48 +0000 http://metamodern.com/?p=5396#comment-2064 Table showing company distributions across countries will be much more helpful for determining the "winner" of nanotechnology. Also don't you also think that 2005 is "too old." Table showing company distributions across countries will be much more helpful for determining the “winner” of nanotechnology. Also don’t you also think that 2005 is “too old.”

]]> By: Asian Universities are Lagging (according to lagging indicators) http://metamodern.com/2009/10/30/nanotechnology-research-papers-the-world%e2%80%99s-most-prolific-authors/comment-page-1/#comment-2023 Asian Universities are Lagging (according to lagging indicators) Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:33:33 +0000 http://metamodern.com/?p=5396#comment-2023 [...] Nanotechnology research papers: The world’s most prolific authors    Subscribe [...] [...] Nanotechnology research papers: The world’s most prolific authors    Subscribe [...]

]]> By: SciGuy http://metamodern.com/2009/10/30/nanotechnology-research-papers-the-world%e2%80%99s-most-prolific-authors/comment-page-1/#comment-2008 SciGuy Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:31:56 +0000 http://metamodern.com/?p=5396#comment-2008 <strong>Has China already passed America in nanotechnology?...</strong> As his fine blog celebrates its first year, engineer and nanotechnology popularizer Eric Drexler has been delving into the question of whether China has surpassed the United States in nano research. Who cares? Nanotechnology is the art and science of..... Has China already passed America in nanotechnology?…

As his fine blog celebrates its first year, engineer and nanotechnology popularizer Eric Drexler has been delving into the question of whether China has surpassed the United States in nano research. Who cares? Nanotechnology is the art and science of…..

]]> By: E-Drexler in India — where do all the visitors come from? http://metamodern.com/2009/10/30/nanotechnology-research-papers-the-world%e2%80%99s-most-prolific-authors/comment-page-1/#comment-2006 E-Drexler in India — where do all the visitors come from? Tue, 03 Nov 2009 05:15:20 +0000 http://metamodern.com/?p=5396#comment-2006 [...] Nanotechnology research papers: The world’s most prolific authors [...] [...] Nanotechnology research papers: The world’s most prolific authors [...]

]]> By: Accelerating Future » Eric Drexler Marks First Year of Blogging http://metamodern.com/2009/10/30/nanotechnology-research-papers-the-world%e2%80%99s-most-prolific-authors/comment-page-1/#comment-1999 Accelerating Future » Eric Drexler Marks First Year of Blogging Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:49:26 +0000 http://metamodern.com/?p=5396#comment-1999 [...] for a year now, producing some good posts worthy of perusal. Check out his post about the world’s most prolific authors in nanotechnology, another on nanotechnology research in China, and a review post of his first year [...] [...] for a year now, producing some good posts worthy of perusal. Check out his post about the world’s most prolific authors in nanotechnology, another on nanotechnology research in China, and a review post of his first year [...]

]]> By: Nanotechnology research: A better picture of work in China http://metamodern.com/2009/10/30/nanotechnology-research-papers-the-world%e2%80%99s-most-prolific-authors/comment-page-1/#comment-1997 Nanotechnology research: A better picture of work in China Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:49:03 +0000 http://metamodern.com/?p=5396#comment-1997 [...] previous post, “Nanotechnology research papers: The world’s most prolific authors”, had statistics that suggested (but didn’t directly indicate) a large global role for [...] [...] previous post, “Nanotechnology research papers: The world’s most prolific authors”, had statistics that suggested (but didn’t directly indicate) a large global role for [...]

]]> By: Patrick http://metamodern.com/2009/10/30/nanotechnology-research-papers-the-world%e2%80%99s-most-prolific-authors/comment-page-1/#comment-1996 Patrick Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:53:57 +0000 http://metamodern.com/?p=5396#comment-1996 I looked at the 2005 paper - I think one of the challenges, of course, is separating the wheat from the chaff in terms of truly important papers and where these originate from. But this is just a variation on the Kuhnian norma/revolutionary science dichotomy, I suppose. Another factor is international collaboration. My work on spintronics with Tim Lenoir (Duke) showed a lot of US-Japanese collab in this sub-field. A closer look at US-China/Taiwan collab might be interesting as well as the phenomenon of Chinese-American scientists working with people in PRC or returning "home." Finally, may I suggest the work of Richard Appelbaum and his research group: http://www.cns.ucsb.edu/research-at-cns-ucsb-18/ I looked at the 2005 paper – I think one of the challenges, of course, is separating the wheat from the chaff in terms of truly important papers and where these originate from. But this is just a variation on the Kuhnian norma/revolutionary science dichotomy, I suppose. Another factor is international collaboration. My work on spintronics with Tim Lenoir (Duke) showed a lot of US-Japanese collab in this sub-field. A closer look at US-China/Taiwan collab might be interesting as well as the phenomenon of Chinese-American scientists working with people in PRC or returning “home.” Finally, may I suggest the work of Richard Appelbaum and his research group:
http://www.cns.ucsb.edu/research-at-cns-ucsb-18/

]]>