<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Most popular posts, continued&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metamodern.com/2009/11/18/most-popular-posts-continued/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/11/18/most-popular-posts-continued/</link>
	<description>The Trajectory of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:14:01 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Knowledge about Knowledge: The most popular posts in the first year</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/11/18/most-popular-posts-continued/comment-page-1/#comment-2147</link>
		<dc:creator>Knowledge about Knowledge: The most popular posts in the first year</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=6022#comment-2147</guid>
		<description>[...] Most popular posts, continued…    &#160;&#160;  Subscribe [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Most popular posts, continued…    &nbsp;&nbsp;  Subscribe [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Drexler</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/11/18/most-popular-posts-continued/comment-page-1/#comment-2121</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Drexler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=6022#comment-2121</guid>
		<description>Garson, that is a good methodology, but it hasn’t given the right answer. I wish that the answer it did give were correct, because the most popular post is (unfortunately) about a topic less worthy of attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Garson, that is a good methodology, but it hasn’t given the right answer. I wish that the answer it did give were correct, because the most popular post is (unfortunately) about a topic less worthy of attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garson</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/11/18/most-popular-posts-continued/comment-page-1/#comment-2117</link>
		<dc:creator>Garson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=6022#comment-2117</guid>
		<description>I would guess that the popular post is titled &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://metamodern.com/2009/05/10/a-dna-origami-box/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A DNA Origami Box&lt;/A&gt;.

To construct this hypothesis I typed &quot;metamodern&quot; into the Google search box and determined which individual article appeared near the top of the search results. Since &quot;A DNA Origami Box&quot; was listed second below the link to the home page of the blog I used that ranking as an admittedly flawed proxy for popularity and traffic.

Originally Google used a &quot;page rank&quot; algorithm for ordering search results. That suggests &quot;A DNA Origami Box&quot; has a large number of incoming links from other highly ranked websites. However, Google has repeatedly re-tuned their algorithm. Today&#039;s algorithm may also incorporate data concerning the number of times a link is clicked when it appears in the list of search results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would guess that the popular post is titled <a HREF="http://metamodern.com/2009/05/10/a-dna-origami-box/" rel="nofollow">A DNA Origami Box</a>.</p>
<p>To construct this hypothesis I typed &#8220;metamodern&#8221; into the Google search box and determined which individual article appeared near the top of the search results. Since &#8220;A DNA Origami Box&#8221; was listed second below the link to the home page of the blog I used that ranking as an admittedly flawed proxy for popularity and traffic.</p>
<p>Originally Google used a &#8220;page rank&#8221; algorithm for ordering search results. That suggests &#8220;A DNA Origami Box&#8221; has a large number of incoming links from other highly ranked websites. However, Google has repeatedly re-tuned their algorithm. Today&#8217;s algorithm may also incorporate data concerning the number of times a link is clicked when it appears in the list of search results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
