<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The promise that launched &#160;the field of nanotechnology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metamodern.com/2009/12/15/when-a-million-readers-first-encountered-nanotechnology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/12/15/when-a-million-readers-first-encountered-nanotechnology/</link>
	<description>The Trajectory of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:15:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Good and popular</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/12/15/when-a-million-readers-first-encountered-nanotechnology/comment-page-1/#comment-4168</link>
		<dc:creator>Good and popular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 01:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=6369#comment-4168</guid>
		<description>[...] [read more...] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [read more...] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Out of the memory-hole: A historian speaks out on nanotechnology</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/12/15/when-a-million-readers-first-encountered-nanotechnology/comment-page-1/#comment-3921</link>
		<dc:creator>Out of the memory-hole: A historian speaks out on nanotechnology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=6369#comment-3921</guid>
		<description>[...] erase this formative decade — and with it, the role of the promise that won public support for the field — isn’t a minor mistake: Like the sticky-fat-fingers propaganda, it’s a residue of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] erase this formative decade — and with it, the role of the promise that won public support for the field — isn’t a minor mistake: Like the sticky-fat-fingers propaganda, it’s a residue of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Which came first, the Nano or the NNI?</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/12/15/when-a-million-readers-first-encountered-nanotechnology/comment-page-1/#comment-3783</link>
		<dc:creator>Which came first, the Nano or the NNI?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 10:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=6369#comment-3783</guid>
		<description>[...] Nothing in the NNI research agenda can explain the perverse link between materials science and the mythology of hungry nanobots, but this headline can:    &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nothing in the NNI research agenda can explain the perverse link between materials science and the mythology of hungry nanobots, but this headline can:    &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: “There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom” (Richard Feynman, Pasadena, 29 December 1959)</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/12/15/when-a-million-readers-first-encountered-nanotechnology/comment-page-1/#comment-2442</link>
		<dc:creator>“There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom” (Richard Feynman, Pasadena, 29 December 1959)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=6369#comment-2442</guid>
		<description>[...] atomically precise fabrication and the advanced technologies it could bring. As I discussed in a recent post, the term and this concept emerged together, in my 1986 book, and launched a wave of media coverage, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] atomically precise fabrication and the advanced technologies it could bring. As I discussed in a recent post, the term and this concept emerged together, in my 1986 book, and launched a wave of media coverage, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Update to “The promise that launched &#160;&#160; the field of nanotechnology”</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/12/15/when-a-million-readers-first-encountered-nanotechnology/comment-page-1/#comment-2387</link>
		<dc:creator>Update to “The promise that launched &#160;&#160; the field of nanotechnology”</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 07:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=6369#comment-2387</guid>
		<description>[...] updated my recent post, “The promise that launched the field of nanotechnology”, with the following graphic:  &#160;Engines of Creation launched a wave of excitement about the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] updated my recent post, “The promise that launched the field of nanotechnology”, with the following graphic:  &nbsp;Engines of Creation launched a wave of excitement about the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Basement development? Big leaps?</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/12/15/when-a-million-readers-first-encountered-nanotechnology/comment-page-1/#comment-2337</link>
		<dc:creator>Basement development? Big leaps?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 21:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=6369#comment-2337</guid>
		<description>[...] Part 1 — The promise that launched the field of nanotechnology [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part 1 — The promise that launched the field of nanotechnology [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molecular Manufacturing: Where’s the progress?</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/12/15/when-a-million-readers-first-encountered-nanotechnology/comment-page-1/#comment-2334</link>
		<dc:creator>Molecular Manufacturing: Where’s the progress?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=6369#comment-2334</guid>
		<description>[...] In my view, these problems of perception and organization are the chief obstacles to more rapid progress in developing molecular machine technologies on the critical path to fulfilling the promise that launched the field of nanotechnology. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In my view, these problems of perception and organization are the chief obstacles to more rapid progress in developing molecular machine technologies on the critical path to fulfilling the promise that launched the field of nanotechnology. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://metamodern.com/2009/12/15/when-a-million-readers-first-encountered-nanotechnology/comment-page-1/#comment-2312</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metamodern.com/?p=6369#comment-2312</guid>
		<description>Great post...I was a huge fan of Omni and I have this issue still.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post&#8230;I was a huge fan of Omni and I have this issue still.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

